Guests - Ava Chen, Paul Gosar, Charles Foley

The CCP's Three-S Strategy: Weakness, Chaos, and Destruction

Ava Chen from the New Federal State of China reveals the systematic approach the Chinese Communist Party has deployed against the United States for nearly a decade. This strategy, exposed by Miles Guo in Washington D.C. on October 5, 2017, operates through three core objectives: foment weakness, foment chaos, and foment destruction of the United States.

Every infiltration, every sleeper agent, every spy, and every asset the CCP has deployed focuses on achieving these three goals. The riots currently erupting in Los Angeles and planned across the country represent the visible manifestation of years of careful psychological manipulation and strategic planning.

Understanding this framework becomes crucial when examining recent events. The CCP doesn't need to fire guns in American streets – they excel at creating conditions where Americans turn against each other while the real orchestrators remain hidden. Their goal is simple: make Americans hate the wrong enemies while the true culprit continues executing long-term plans for American collapse.

The 2019-2020 Playbook

The current riots follow patterns established during Trump's first presidency. In 2019, protests began as China trade talks neared completion. The CCP's strategy involved stalling negotiations and wasting Trump's time, knowing that as an elected leader, Trump faced term limits while dictator Xi Jinping could wait indefinitely.

The tactical approach included giving false promises during trade negotiations, then failing to live up to agreements in order to destroy Trump's credibility. These smaller tactics built toward the larger biological weapon release – COVID-19 – which successfully derailed Trump's reelection campaign.

According to intelligence shared with Peter Navarro and Stephen Bannon, the pandemic was deliberately released to stall and derail Trump's 2020 election. This intelligence proved accurate, as the bioweapon attack combined with election irregularities achieved the CCP's immediate objective of removing their most feared adversary from power.

The CCP's most hated individuals include President Trump, Stephen Bannon, Peter Navarro, Rudy Giuliani, and Miles Guo. Through sophisticated psychological operations, the CCP successfully transformed these five individuals from being the CCP's enemies into being perceived as enemies of the Biden administration and extreme leftists in America.

The Art of Deception and Division

The CCP's greatest strength lies in deception. They create fiction in people's minds that misleads judgment about who the real enemy is, using sophisticated psychological manipulation to reshape reality perception. Their operations focus on three primary tactics that work in coordination to achieve the three-S objectives.

First, they sow discord because they oppose unity. Second, they create divisions, wanting to fragment any unified group into multiple factions – splitting two factions into four, four into eight, eight into sixteen, until complete dysfunction results. Third, they fuel hatred between these created factions, allowing internal conflicts to destroy American cohesion.

To achieve these goals, the CCP requires extensive infiltration. They need people disguised and mixed within American society – whether as business people, public servants, think tank leaders, students, or any other role that provides access and influence. This infiltration allows coordinated action from within American institutions.

Media manipulation represents the second critical component. Through controlling information delivery channels – social media, news feeds, search engines – the CCP ensures Americans receive wrong information leading to misjudgment of situations. Big tech companies today serve totalitarian dictatorship rather than common people, making this manipulation possible.

The effect resembles someone replacing critical pieces of a puzzle. Americans think they're assembling a complete picture, but compromised puzzle pieces ensure they can never finish the image correctly, no matter how hard they try.

Tiananmen Square: The Historical Template

The June 4, 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre provides the historical template for understanding current CCP operations. Before the massacre, China's economy had become extremely difficult under CCP rule, similar to today's internal crisis that mainstream media doesn't report.

In 1988, the CCP faced a spoke agreement with the Chinese people: political obedience in exchange for economic development. When this promise failed and people's lives worsened, great resentment and discontent built against CCP rule, culminating in student movements that reached their peak in April, May, and June 1989.

The entire nation united in outrage directed at the CCP. Politicians and observers worldwide believed this student movement would deliver the final blow ending CCP rule in China. But the CCP clawed back from near-death using psychological operations and narrative warfare against its own people.

The process began with infiltration of student groups and leadership. The CCP created rumors and divisions within student movements, using agitators to make students appear unreasonable. Weeks before the crackdown, the CCP engaged in televised dialogues with student representatives, portraying themselves as reasonable government officials willing to listen while painting students as aggressive and unreasonable.

The Staged Atrocity

Several days before the actual massacre, the CCP took steps to prevent almost all news outlets from reporting events. They cleaned out journalists, leaving only selected media they could manipulate for propaganda purposes. This ensured no American news outlets could report the 1989 massacre truthfully.

On June 3rd, under direct orders from PLA General Yang Baibing, a gruesome staged event occurred near Beijing's Muxidi Bridge. The PLA burned a dead soldier's corpse, hung the soldier on a tree, photographed the scene, and invited the state-controlled Guangming Daily newspaper to publish it as headline news claiming this was violent behavior by students.

This staged atrocity stirred anger among Chinese people toward students right before the massacre began. The CCP invited student representatives for pretend negotiations even as they had already trained multiple kill squads starting in late March and early April, fully intending to use maximum violence for the crackdown.

The kill squads were specially trained and isolated. Many were illiterate and barred from accessing news ten days prior to deployment. They were told they were participating in military exercises and didn't know they had real bullets. Many wouldn't have participated if they understood the true mission.

The Chemical Weapons Backup Plan

The CCP's most sinister plan involved chemical weapons as backup. They positioned special operations troops in five to six ancient temples in Beijing's Chaoyang district, armed with lethal mustard gas bullets. If the kill squads got out of control or refused orders, these hidden troops would fire mustard gas to kill everyone – students, soldiers, and bystanders.

This plan included another layer of deception. The special troops were ordered to wear plain clothes rather than army uniforms. If chemical weapons were deployed, another elite police force stood ready to destroy these "terrorists," with police being hailed as national heroes while students would be blamed for the deaths of the special troops.

The mustard gas plan never activated because the kill squads carried out their mission with brutal efficiency. According to declassified British consulate cables, minimum 10,000 people died that night, though Miles Guo estimates 50,000 casualties in Beijing alone.

The lesson reveals how everyone was manipulated: soldiers, students, student representatives, different kill squads, special troops, and police forces. If all these groups had understood the CCP's complete scheme, they wouldn't have participated, and the operation would have failed.

Modern Application: Immigration and Riots

Today's immigration crisis follows the same manipulation pattern. Why did the Biden administration import 10-20 million illegal aliens? The CCP wants Americans to hate the wrong enemies – to hate Democrats, illegal aliens, and people pushing certain agendas, while the real culprits who scheme against America remain hidden.

The CCP controls media reports to deny Americans truth about who's really responsible. They want Americans to become either foolish – deprived of valuable information – or radical and violent so Americans kill each other. This represents their preferred outcome: Americans fighting Americans while the CCP continues its systematic destruction.

The narrative that "Trump is a rapist, dictator, felon, and narcissist" doesn't come from truth but from fiction the CCP creates. They want Democrats fighting Republicans while they laugh and walk away, continuing to kill Americans with fentanyl and other chemical warfare tactics.

Fentanyl: The Ultimate Chemical Warfare

Fentanyl represents sophisticated chemical warfare directed at Americans, with the CCP having planned from A to Z how to create total societal collapse. Their ultimate goal involves open-sourcing the secret formula for fentanyl production to everyone, ensuring Americans kill Americans with no CCP accountability.

The progression follows deliberate steps: first shipping pills directly, then pretending to negotiate with DEA while switching to precursor chemicals. When caught, they reroute through Mexico and Canada. Every step follows their predetermined plan to kill America without firing a shot.

Once they achieve final-stage open sourcing of fentanyl formulas, cartels in Mexico, Canada, and Colombia already know production methods. If formulas become public, everyone can manufacture fentanyl, meaning Americans will kill Americans while no one holds the CCP accountable.

Congressman Gosar on Government Waste and NGO Transparency

Congressman Paul Gosar brings firsthand insight into how federal funding flows to organizations potentially supporting activities that harm American interests. His NGO Transparency Act represents a critical step toward understanding who receives taxpayer money and how it's being used against American citizens.

The NGO Funding Mystery

Gosar has spent six months attempting to discover how federal money flows to non-governmental organizations, only to be repeatedly stonewalled by federal agencies. The IRS provides NGO information to other entities but refuses to share it with sitting congressmen, creating a transparency crisis around taxpayer-funded activities.

"We spent better part of six months trying to figure this out and they drove us down this line where we had to make definitions of what an NGO is," Gosar explains. His legislation defines NGOs as any non-government office taking federal money either directly or indirectly through pass-through funding.

The choice becomes simple: organizations can avoid compliance by refusing federal money, or they can take federal money and provide full transparency about all funding sources. This approach will reveal whether Chinese, Russian, or other foreign entities are funding activities against American interests.

The cynical reality suggests much of this money is American taxpayer dollars being laundered back to organizations that use it against American citizens. During COVID national emergency spending of $4.8 to $7 trillion, not one receipt exists showing where money went. Federal forensics teams have recaptured over $300 billion from COVID spending fraud, but even that recovered money has disappeared without a trace.

The Medical Infiltration Program

During Trump's first presidency, Gosar discovered a troubling immigration program bringing 60,000 Chinese, Pakistani, and Indian doctors into American public health systems. When he suggested to Trump that this program could be eliminated with a signature since Congress never authorized it, he was quickly ushered out of the room.

The program becomes more disturbing when considering that America has at least 7,000 to 9,000 American-trained doctors who cannot practice because they lack residency program placement. Rather than supporting American medical graduates, the system imports foreign doctors for public health positions – a decision that raises questions about infiltration and compromise of critical healthcare infrastructure.

This revelation connects to broader concerns about why foreign medical personnel are prioritized over American-trained professionals, especially in public health roles that could be crucial during health emergencies or bioweapon attacks.

The Recisions Package: Exposing Waste

The House vote on the $10 billion recisions package reveals the absurd extent of federal waste. Examples include $1.9 million for NPR (which Gosar notes could find its own "sugar daddy" rather than remaining on public funding), $157,000 for free education and healthcare to Ecuadorian and Venezuelan migrants, and $33,000 for LGBTQ programs in migrant caravans.

International spending becomes even more ridiculous: $567,000 for LGBTQ+ programs in Uganda, $500,000 for electric buses in Rwanda (despite Rwanda lacking electricity infrastructure), and $146,000 for LGBTQ programs in Western Balkans. These expenditures represent just the tip of the iceberg in a system that prioritizes political messaging over practical governance.

Gosar emphasizes this represents the first of multiple recision bills, with more aggressive cuts coming as the true extent of federal waste becomes clear. The goal involves holding organizations accountable for spending that serves foreign interests rather than American taxpayers.

Medicaid Reform and State Responsibility

The "one big beautiful bill" contains critical Medicaid reforms that expose how federal policy has been manipulated to benefit blue states at red state expense. Traditional Medicaid populations – disabled individuals, single mothers, and children – receive $1.37 in federal matching funds for every state dollar invested.

However, expanded Medicaid populations implemented under previous administrations receive $9 in federal return for every $1 states invest. This expansion covered able-bodied adults with no children who could work or access emergency room services through existing programs.

Gosar proposes cutting expanded populations from $9-to-$1 back to $1-to-$1 ratios while redirecting savings to traditional populations that need services most. Block grants across states would allow healthcare decisions at state level rather than federal control, preventing the single-payer system that current fee structures create.

Simple reforms would save massive amounts: work requirements for able-bodied recipients save $300 billion annually, while requiring annual reapplication saves another $300 billion. Capping expenditures at current levels with medical inflation growth saves $900 billion to $1.2 trillion over time.

Salt Deduction Controversy

The State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction controversy reveals how federal policy subsidizes dysfunctional blue state tax structures. The $350 billion cost represents Arizona taxpayers (with average household income of $54,000) subsidizing California, New York, and Illinois residents who choose to live in high-tax states.

Gosar emphasizes the hypocrisy: states want local control and states' rights until they need federal bailouts for mismanaged tax policies. Residents in these states don't get called out by constituents for high taxes because they receive federal deductions that hide the real cost of their state's dysfunction.

The Senate faces pressure to remove SALT limitations, but Republican senators from affected states don't exist in sufficient numbers to demand this subsidy. This represents a clear choice between supporting failed blue state policies or maintaining fairness for taxpayers in well-managed states.

Border Enforcement and Criminal Accountability

The current immigration enforcement actions target violent criminals who pose dangers to all Americans, regardless of immigration status. ICE operations focus on individuals with documented criminal records beyond immigration violations – people who have committed serious crimes and threaten community safety.

Gosar emphasizes that aiding and abetting illegal actions or illegal immigrants constitutes criminal behavior. Faith-based groups walking people through Central America and Mexico while being paid by various organizations represent clear violations of American law that should face prosecution.

The upcoming NGO transparency reports will likely reveal coordination between government funding and organizations facilitating illegal immigration. This represents systematic use of taxpayer money to violate immigration laws, creating the crisis that now requires military intervention to resolve.

Flag Day and American Symbolism Under Attack

Charles Foley, founder of Flags for the Flagless, brings a law enforcement perspective to the symbolic warfare currently playing out in American streets. As a former police officer with two decades of experience, Foley understands both the legal protections for flag burning and the deeper implications of organized attacks on American symbols.

The Right to Burn, The Duty to Defend

Flag burning represents constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment, a reality that frustrated Foley during his law enforcement career. When he asked supervisors what would happen if he grabbed a flag being burned in front of him, the answer was clear: he would face disciplinary action because police officers serve as defenders of the Constitution, including protections for speech they personally find offensive.

This legal reality doesn't diminish the emotional impact of watching American flags burned while foreign flags are celebrated in American streets. The current riots feature protesters trading foreign flags for American flags not out of patriotism, but as tactical deception to appear more sympathetic to American audiences.

"The American flag belongs to no individual person, no individual group, no media corporation, and no religious faction," Foley emphasizes. "That flag belongs to the American people." This ownership transcends political affiliations and temporary leadership, representing principles that endure beyond any single administration.

Planned Violence vs. Peaceful Protest

The distinction between peaceful protest and coordinated violence becomes clear through planning and equipment evidence. Protesters arrive with goggles, masks, Molotov cocktails, and cinder blocks – equipment that reveals advance planning for violence rather than spontaneous expression of grievances.

Law enforcement faces an impossible situation when entire departments get tied up managing riots while normal emergency calls continue throughout the city. During riots, who responds to domestic violence calls, car accidents, and mental health crises? The answer often is: no one, because all available officers are managing organized violence.

Foley recognizes the tactical superiority of military personnel deployed to support immigration enforcement. Unlike police officers who rarely face physical fitness testing after initial hiring, military personnel maintain conditioning, cohesion, and tactical precision that creates overwhelming advantage when making arrests.

The speed, surprise, and coordination displayed by Marine Corps units protecting ICE agents demonstrates why military support becomes necessary when local capacity is overwhelmed by organized violence. These aren't random arrests – they target specific individuals with legal warrants obtained through proper judicial processes.

The Criminal Element Behind the Protests

Recent arrests reveal the criminal nature of many protest participants. Federal charges include possession of unregistered destructive devices for Molotov cocktail throwing, while state charges address individuals throwing cinder blocks at passing federal vehicles and committing other violent acts.

One arrest involved a previously deported illegal immigrant charged with attempted murder during ongoing Los Angeles riots. This individual's criminal record includes grand theft and DUI convictions in California – exactly the type of repeat offender that immigration enforcement targets for removal.

These arrests demonstrate that ICE operations focus on documented criminals rather than random harassment of immigrant communities. The violent response to law enforcement actions reveals the criminal networks that benefit from sanctuary policies and open border conditions.

Nationwide Coordination and Foreign Influence

The timing of nationwide protests for Flag Day, President Trump's birthday, and the Army's 250th anniversary reveals coordination that extends beyond organic community organization. Professional coordination of masks, equipment, and tactical guidance suggests funding and planning from entities with sophisticated organizational capabilities.

Foley notes the pattern established during previous riots: Portland experienced 100 consecutive days of rioting with minimal federal response, while Seattle lost police stations to organized violence. The current administration's willingness to deploy military support represents a fundamental shift toward protecting law enforcement's ability to do their jobs.

The presence of foreign flags during "American" protests, followed by tactical switches to American flags when negative publicity develops, reveals sophisticated public relations management that suggests professional coordination rather than grassroots organization.

Public Safety and Community Response

Foley strongly discourages counter-protests, emphasizing the danger civilians face when confronting organized, potentially violent groups without adequate protection. Counter-protesters would subject themselves to violence while providing no constructive benefit to their communities.

The hatred and violence displayed by protesters – standing on burning cars with hidden faces while destruction occurs around them – creates unsafe conditions for anyone who disagrees with their actions. Peaceful flag displays or country support would not receive passes from groups committed to maximum chaos and division.

Instead of counter-protests, Foley encourages Americans to support law enforcement through prayers, political engagement, and recognition that current enforcement actions target documented criminals rather than randomly harassing communities. The goal involves restoring rule of law while protecting the constitutional principles the American flag represents.

The Broader Strategic Picture

The coordination of riots with immigration enforcement reveals strategic timing designed to prevent effective law enforcement while creating maximum political pressure on the current administration. Foreign entities benefit when American law enforcement cannot function and American communities turn against each other.

Foley's law enforcement experience provides insight into how professional criminals operate and how organized violence differs from spontaneous community response. The current riots display characteristics of professional operations designed to achieve specific political objectives rather than address legitimate grievances.

The choice facing American communities involves supporting constitutional law enforcement or allowing criminal networks to operate with impunity while hiding behind claims of civil rights and peaceful protest. The distinction becomes clear through examining who gets arrested and what crimes they've committed, rather than accepting media narratives about immigration enforcement.