Guests - Bill Walton, Laurie Moore, Anton Chaitkin

Strategic Disruption and the Big Beautiful Bill

Bill Walton, America's common sense CEO and host of the Bill Walton Show, recognizes the current riot cycle as strategic disruption designed to draw attention away from critical legislative priorities. The violence in Los Angeles serves multiple purposes for Democrats: it demonizes Trump for deploying federal troops while forcing Democrats into the impossible position of appearing to support insurrection.

The timing isn't coincidental. Every major news cycle now seems to generate new headlines every hour, creating a constant state of distraction from substantive policy work. The riots give Democrats a chance to attack Trump's use of military force while simultaneously making them look like they're defending criminal behavior.

"Maybe California is going to secede from the union," Walton observes, noting the disconnect between Los Angeles preparing to host the World Cup while simultaneously allowing their city to be destroyed. The mayor talks about making the city beautiful for international visitors while ignoring the chaos happening outside her door.

The Immigration Enforcement Reality

ICE agents are doing their jobs by removing criminals from American streets, yet the opposition frames these enforcement actions as attacks on "friends and neighbors." This characterization reveals either deliberate deception or shocking ignorance about who actually gets targeted for removal.

The question becomes: are these officials really associating with gang members, thugs, and murderers? Because those are the individuals ICE prioritizes for deportation – not random community members, but documented criminals who pose public safety threats.

Democrats operate as if someone else should be responsible for making society function. Someone else should prepare LA for hosting international events, someone else should repair wildfire damage, someone else should maintain civil order. Their only responsibility appears to be protecting people who shouldn't be protected.

This disconnect will resonate with voters and further marginalize the Democratic Party. It makes Trump appear mature and responsible – the adult in the room dealing with real problems while his opposition throws tantrums.

Chinese Communist Party Connections

The CCP's fingerprints appear throughout recent crises. Three of the Pacific Palisades arsonists had CCP connections, while California's governor previously welcomed Chinese influence into his state. The well-funded, well-organized nature of current protests mirrors previous BLM operations, suggesting professional coordination rather than organic community response.

Media coverage attempts to portray these demonstrations as spontaneous expressions of community outrage, but the logistics, timing, and messaging reveal sophisticated planning. When protesters initially flew Mexican flags and faced criticism, they quickly switched to American flags – a tactical adjustment that demonstrates organized public relations management.

Walton identifies a growing recognition that the Chinese Communist Party has influenced major American legislation, particularly the Inflation Reduction Act (essentially the Green New Deal). The "big beautiful bill" includes provisions to repeal one to three trillion dollars in climate and solar battery subsidies – policies that primarily benefited Chinese manufacturing interests.

"You don't have to look very hard and you can see the Chinese Communist Party has its hand in every issue," Walton notes. This interconnection of seemingly separate issues reveals a pattern of foreign influence that extends far beyond individual policy debates.

Legislative Priorities and Compromises

The big beautiful bill faces political realities in a closely divided Congress. Walton acknowledges the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction controversy, where the rest of America essentially subsidizes high-tax states like California, New York, and Illinois. While philosophically objectionable, political horse-trading may require accepting SALT provisions to secure larger priorities.

The bill must preserve tax cuts and remove able-bodied people from Medicaid while pulling back trillions in green energy subsidies. These represent fundamental corrections to policies that have distorted American economic priorities for years.

Initially, many Trump supporters expected to see immediate implementation of Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) recommendations. However, the legislative process requires separate recision bills to achieve the spending cuts that DOGE identified. The $9.4 billion recision package represents the first step in implementing the waste reduction that voters demanded.

Trump's Evolution as President

Walton participated in Trump's 2016 transition, heading strategic planning for financial agencies. That experience revealed Trump's inexperience with Washington's complexity – he didn't understand the need to appoint 4,000 people to run federal agencies, having previously managed only real estate and entertainment operations.

The current administration demonstrates Trump's learning curve. He's assembled strong cabinet secretaries, particularly in energy policy where Doug Burgum at Energy, a governor candidate at Interior, and Lee Zeldin at EPA are rolling back regulations that hurt American competitiveness.

Susie Wiles as chief of staff represents a different profile from previous appointments. Trump's ability to work with former critics like "little Marco" Rubio, now Secretary of State, shows his capacity for growth and practical political judgment.

Behind the scenes, officials like Russ Vought at OMB work on repairing institutional damage while more visible figures like Pete Hegseth, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Tom Homan, and Kristi Noem handle public-facing corrections in areas most damaged by previous policies.

Military and Cultural Restoration

Pete Hegseth faces enormous challenges at the Defense Department beyond typical administrative difficulties. Lloyd Austin and the Biden team wrecked military morale and culture through DEI programs and climate change priorities that subordinated warfighting to political messaging.

The military had been organized around climate change concerns, with discussions of battery-powered tanks that would require recharging during combat operations. This kind of absurd prioritization demonstrates how far military culture had drifted from its core mission of defending America.

Hegseth's focus on men and women in uniform represents a return to proper priorities. The forced COVID vaccinations and other policies drove out quality personnel, contributing to recruitment crises that only began improving after Trump's election victory.

Military recruitment statistics tell the story: 75-80% of high school graduates cannot qualify for military service due to fitness, drug, or mental health issues. Bobby Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again initiative addresses these fundamental problems that affect not just military readiness but national competitiveness.

The Bigger Picture

Trump's approach covers every aspect of American governance – there's nothing too small that he won't address. This comprehensive approach reflects understanding that America's problems interconnect and require systematic solutions rather than piecemeal responses.

The razor-thin margins in both House and Senate require political compromise, but the fundamental direction remains clear: restore American sovereignty, competitiveness, and institutional integrity. Whether dealing with riots in Los Angeles, Chinese influence operations, or military recruitment challenges, the administration focuses on protecting American interests against both foreign and domestic threats.

This represents more than partisan politics – it's about whether America can maintain the institutional strength necessary for self-governance in an increasingly complex and dangerous world.

Tucson's Night of Destruction: When Peaceful Protest Becomes Criminal Behavior

Tucson experienced its own version of organized chaos as approximately 300 protesters gathered to express "solidarity" with Los Angeles rioters. What began as advertised peaceful protest quickly devolved into property destruction, assaults on security personnel, and the kind of criminal behavior that has become standard operating procedure for these coordinated demonstrations.

The Anatomy of Manufactured Outrage

The protest started around 4:30 PM, marching from Valencia and South Country Club to the backside of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. Organizers advertised this as peaceful protest against legal deportation operations, but the reality on the ground told a different story.

By 5:15 PM, protesters had thrown metal barricades to the ground while screaming expletives at security guards. They broke reflective windows on the ICE office building and threw full cans of food, water bottles, and smoke grenades at law enforcement. Security guards retreated while approximately 32 police officers in riot gear faced off against the crowd across a parking lot.

The language used reveals the true nature of these demonstrations. Chants included "Kill ICE agents" and streams of profanity directed at both federal officers and President Trump. This wasn't peaceful expression of political disagreement – it was organized intimidation designed to prevent law enforcement from doing their jobs.

The Justification Game

Protesters attempted to justify their actions through several false narratives. Some claimed the land was "stolen" and therefore nobody could be illegal on indigenous territory. Others framed ICE operations as attacks on "neighbors and friends," deliberately obscuring the reality that enforcement targets documented criminals.

A teacher present at the demonstration claimed there was "no excuse to quash the public with ICE and the Marines and the National Guard," arguing this was "contrary to everything our nation was founded upon." But the Constitution protects peaceful assembly, not violent destruction of property or assaults on federal officers.

The founding fathers put everything on the line to create a nation based on rule of law, not mob rule. When protesters throw objects at law enforcement, break windows, and block traffic, they're not exercising constitutional rights – they're committing crimes that undermine the very system they claim to defend.

Law Enforcement Response and Challenges

The Tucson Police Department faced an impossible situation with limited resources. Currently operating with approximately 700 officers (down from 900 in 2020), TPD couldn't adequately respond to both riot control and normal emergency calls throughout the city.

Security guards initially responded with non-lethal weapons including flashbangs, pepper spray, and pepper balls to disperse crowds. When protesters began breaking windows and throwing objects, guards had no choice but to retreat until police could arrive in riot gear.

By 6:20 PM, about half the protesters had left, reducing the crowd from 300 to 150. Those who remained blocked Valencia Road, prompting another police response that resulted in three arrests. Many protesters departed when violence and property damage began, suggesting that even among participants, there was recognition that events had crossed legal boundaries.

The Real Targets of ICE Enforcement

ICE operations target individuals with criminal records beyond immigration violations – people convicted of murder, rape, drug trafficking, and other serious crimes. These aren't community members going about their daily lives; they're documented threats to public safety who have received due process through the court system.

Recent arrests in Los Angeles include individuals charged with attempted murder and possession of unregistered destructive devices (Molotov cocktails). One arrestee was a previously deported illegal immigrant with a criminal record including grand theft and DUI convictions in California.

The characterization of these enforcement actions as attacks on "neighbors and friends" represents either deliberate deception or shocking ignorance about who gets prioritized for removal. Law enforcement doesn't conduct random sweeps or target people based on appearance – they execute legally obtained warrants against specific individuals.

Media Manipulation and Flag Symbolism

The protest dynamics reveal sophisticated public relations management. When flying Mexican flags in American cities generated negative publicity, organizers quickly distributed American flags to create different optics. This tactical switch demonstrates professional coordination rather than organic community response.

The normalization of foreign flags in American cities represents a fundamental challenge to national sovereignty. If people fled their home countries seeking better opportunities in America, why would they burn American flags while celebrating the symbols of the nations they supposedly escaped?

Flag symbolism matters because it represents underlying loyalties and intentions. When protesters display foreign flags while attacking American law enforcement, they reveal their true allegiances and motivations.

Community Impact and Business Consequences

Downtown Tucson already struggles with declining business activity due to crime, homelessness, and general disorder. The library has effectively become a homeless shelter, bus stops are unsafe, and property crimes drive away legitimate commerce.

Last night's violence compounds these existing problems. Business owners who have invested their life savings in serving the community now face additional risks from organized political violence on top of routine crime and disorder.

The economic impact extends beyond immediate property damage. When businesses close due to crime and instability, entire neighborhoods lose essential services. Low-income residents without reliable transportation suffer most when local stores and services disappear.

The Broader Pattern

Tucson's riot follows patterns established in Los Angeles, Portland, Seattle, and other cities where organized violence has been normalized as "peaceful protest." Professional coordination of equipment, tactics, and messaging suggests funding and planning from entities with sophisticated organizational capabilities.

The timing coincides with Flag Day, President Trump's birthday, and the Army's 250th anniversary – suggesting deliberate symbolic targeting rather than spontaneous community response. The "No Kings" branding attempts to frame immigration enforcement as tyranny while ignoring the democratic mandate that elected Trump specifically to restore border security.

Moving Forward

Tucson faces a choice between supporting constitutional law enforcement or allowing criminal networks to operate with impunity while hiding behind claims of civil rights. The distinction becomes clear through examining who gets arrested and what crimes they've committed, rather than accepting media narratives about immigration enforcement.

The city's limited police resources make it impossible to handle both routine crime and organized political violence simultaneously. Without adequate support for law enforcement, Tucson risks following the path of other cities that have normalized criminal behavior under the guise of political expression.

Citizens who value rule of law must recognize that these aren't isolated incidents but part of a broader campaign to prevent effective governance through intimidation and chaos. The choice involves supporting institutions that maintain civil order or accepting the gradual breakdown of community safety and economic vitality.

Historical Perspective: America's Fight for Universal Progress

Anton Chaitkin, historian and author of "Who We Are: America's Fight for Universal Progress from Franklin to Kennedy," brings a unique long-term perspective to current challenges facing American leadership and international relations. His 50 years of research reveal patterns that explain both America's greatest achievements and the forces that have consistently worked to undermine national progress.

The Two-Faction Framework

Throughout American history, two distinct factions have competed for control of national direction. The progressive nationalists – using "progressive" in its original meaning – have consistently promoted industrial development, scientific advancement, and the elevation of common people. They believe in America's mission to demonstrate that prosperity and progress can benefit all nations through cooperation rather than domination.

The opposing faction represents empire interests, originally British but now manifested through globalist financial networks. This group has consistently sought to prevent any nation from becoming powerful enough to challenge their control, using "free trade" policies, cultural subversion, and military conflicts to destabilize potential rivals.

The assassinations of the 1960s – President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. – represent the moment when the empire faction successfully hijacked American leadership. This wasn't random violence but calculated elimination of leaders who threatened globalist control through their commitment to national sovereignty and universal progress.

The British Empire's Continuing Influence

Current international conflicts trace back to British imperial strategy rather than genuine American interests. The war in Ukraine and the ongoing Middle East conflicts both serve globalist agendas that benefit financial networks rather than American national security.

"The British are the ones that are doing this war. This isn't an American war," Chaitkin explains. "We are the dumb giant that has been roped into these things with the help of various kinds of really crazy people within the United States who are simply working for that globalist interest."

Max Blumenthal's recent analysis of British organizing Ukrainian attacks on Russian nuclear bombers inside Russia demonstrates how empire factions manipulate conflicts toward potential nuclear confrontation. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov acknowledged this reality by stating they would focus criticism on "Anglo" rather than "Anglo-Saxon" influences, recognizing Britain as the primary agitator.

The False Scarcity Doctrine

Globalist opposition to American progress rests on the false premise of limited resources popularized by British economist Malthus. This East India Company theorist argued that human populations would always outgrow available resources, necessitating population control and preventing technological advancement in developing nations.

This entire framework contradicts both Christian principles and observable reality. Coal and oil weren't resources to primitive humans – they became resources through technological development. Water power, uranium, and countless other materials became useful only after human creativity and scientific advancement made them accessible.

Abraham Lincoln understood this principle when he promoted scientific farming techniques that could increase production per acre while improving soil quality. He believed that communities of productive farmers would remain "free of land kings, crowned kings, and money kings" – achieving independence through competence rather than dependence on financial manipulation.

The Infrastructure Imperative

America's greatest achievements came through federal support for infrastructure development combined with private enterprise. Every major railroad began with government assistance, not through socialism but through national commitment to connecting and developing the continent.

Current infrastructure deficiencies reveal how far America has fallen from this model. While Chinese freight trains travel 200 miles per hour, American freight crawls at 25 miles per hour. This disparity affects every business trying to move goods efficiently, undermining competitiveness across all sectors.

The space program, nuclear power development, and high-speed transportation all require the same federal leadership that built the transcontinental railroad and established land-grant universities. These aren't wasteful government programs but strategic investments in national capability and competitiveness.

Educational and Cultural Restoration

Effective education must orient toward productive careers rather than cultural indoctrination. When students understand they're preparing for high-wage manufacturing jobs, scientific research, or technological development, academic achievement improves naturally. Education succeeds when connected to economic mission and national purpose.

The cultural degradation that began in the 1960s wasn't accidental but deliberate psychological warfare designed to undermine American confidence and capability. The British Empire used opium to weaken China; similar tactics have been deployed against American society through cultural subversion and drug proliferation.

Restoration requires returning to principles that made America the world's leading industrial and scientific power. This means valuing human creativity, supporting technological advancement, and believing in unlimited progress through applied intelligence and moral commitment.

International Cooperation vs. Globalist Control

True American leadership involves helping other nations develop their own industrial capabilities rather than maintaining them as resource colonies or cheap labor sources. When America was at its best, it promoted railroad construction, steel production, and scientific education in countries like Germany, Russia, and Japan.

This approach creates genuine partnerships rather than dependencies. Mexico could have wages comparable to American levels if allowed to develop modern steel mills, advanced agriculture, and technological education. Current globalist policies deliberately prevent such development to maintain cheap labor and resource extraction relationships.

The Middle East offers another example. Iran has abundant oil and uranium resources that could support advanced nuclear power programs for peaceful purposes. Instead of constant threats and sanctions, America could offer technological cooperation that serves both nations' interests while reducing conflict potential.

Nuclear Technology and Energy Independence

John Kennedy's vision for nuclear power included both American energy independence and international cooperation through the International Atomic Energy Agency. He promoted nuclear-powered desalination plants and peaceful atomic energy development as alternatives to weapons proliferation.

This approach would give countries like Iran positive outlets for their nuclear capabilities while reducing weapons development incentives. Nuclear technology for peaceful purposes creates prosperity and stability; restrictions that prevent peaceful development often push nations toward weapons programs.

America needs to complete the nuclear fuel cycle, including waste recycling, to achieve true energy independence. Combined with fusion power research and deep space exploration, nuclear technology represents the foundation for unlimited economic growth and international cooperation.

The Path Forward

Solving current crises requires understanding that America's greatest achievements came from leaders who believed in universal progress and human potential. Whether addressing border security, international conflicts, or economic competition, the solution involves rebuilding American industrial and scientific capabilities rather than engaging in endless military interventions.

The globalist faction benefits from American weakness and confusion. A strong America with modern infrastructure, advanced technology, and productive industries offers the world genuine leadership through example rather than coercion.

This requires political leaders who understand the difference between empire building and nation building, between financial manipulation and productive investment, between cultural subversion and genuine progress. The choice facing America involves returning to principles that made the nation great or accepting continued decline under globalist management.

Recovery demands recognition that the 1960s assassinations marked a fundamental change in American leadership, and restoration requires conscious commitment to the values and methods that built America into the world's leading industrial power.